But I’m glad you found your RAW converter of choice.Ĭapture One was probably sponsored by Fujifilm, SONY and Nikon. Second, if you compare an app with a lot of features another app doesn’t have and this other app need (!) additional apps at additional costs to deliver the same spectrum of features, you’re not acting exactly fair. Although pretty capable cameras, this brand is no longer “popular”, just check different shopping malls.
Of course you have a different opinion on that, but I don’t recall to have seen a Pentax somewhere else than in the 2nd hand shelves during the past 5 years. For which Capture One was programmed originally. I really don’t care if the two apps get the very same identical results as long as I get fast and secure enough to the results I want.įirst, your camera brand is not popular enough for C1 - but neither are PhaseOne bodies for the majority of us.
What good is a racing car if it’s loosing it’s tyres twice a day?ĭxO has the lead in ClearView and DeepPrime - but I don’t often do “side-by-side comparisons”, so my judgement is only relevant to me. So far I always could fix it, but that makes the 10-20% more speed (didn’t measure, but it’s not tremendous) a bit questionable. Tethered shooting with C1 - does PL offer something like that? DxO is slower in exporting, C1 21 is crashing rather often on my machine and leaves it’s database in a mess. I usually like layers of C1 better than PL’s awkward “local adjustments”. And PL still behind in terms of DAM, manufacturer lens support, better “filmstrip” browser and a couple of more features. However, if you add to PL what a lot of users here added to make it at least work better (perspective and film stuff are onboard on C1, an image viewer with sort of advanced DAM functions as well), the pricing is more or less equal. Well, the last “22” version I also skip as the new features are either a bit lame (panorama is rather mediocre) or I don’t need it. iridient – Iridient X-Transformer 2.0.Personally, I gave up on C1 a while ago because off their excessive pricing.Speaking of DxO, recently they also added X-Trans support to DxO PureRAW 2.Īnd since we talk editing, I thought to make a mini-roundup with some of the editing related articles, including the ones of Thomas mentioned above in this article.
DXO PHOTOLAB 2 VS CAPTURE ONE FREE
If you are using DxO PhotoLab 5 already, feel free to let me (and us all) know in the comments what you think about it. A downside: in order to use Fujifilm’s film simulation, you have to purchase also the “ DXO Film Pack” as an extra.
Thomas Fitzgerald, my go-to source for all things X-Trans files editing (links below) says that DxO is the best X-Trans converter for “ Pure Image Quality” in combination with DxO’s DeepPrime noise reduction technology.
DXO PHOTOLAB 2 VS CAPTURE ONE SOFTWARE
So much so, that, even though I am a hardcore CaptureOne user and lover, I think DxO PhotoLab 5 will be the one software I will check out in depth in 2022 as it seems to perform better than anything else. And from all I could see so far, the results are absolutely fantastic. The arguably most exciting event was DxO finally supporting Fujifilm X-Trans files with DxO PhotoLab 5. A few exciting things happened on the X Trans demosaicing front recently.
0 kommentar(er)
